Taliban Under Fire: What Comes Next in 2026?
Last Updated: February 22, 2026
Kabul, framed by the rugged Hindu Kush mountain range, stands as a crossroads of history. For over three millennia, this city has survived the rise and fall of countless regimes.
(Afghanistan has been used as a crossing by various powers; its borders have been shaped through centuries of colonial rivalry—carved out by foreign pens to separate empires rather than unite a people.)
Historically, Afghanistan has been a "roundabout" used by global powers, from Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan to the early Arab conquests—not as a destination, but as a connection to the wealth of India and Central Asia.
The very shape of Afghanistan is a map of colonial anxiety. Its borders, the Durand Line to the south and the Wakhan Corridor to the east, were not drawn by Afghans to unite a people, but by British and Russian pencil-strokes to separate empires. This 'artificial shape' forced dozens of different ethnic groups into a single cage, creating the structural instability that reclusive leaders like Akhundzada exploit today.
The Geopolitical Game: the USA and Afghanistan
In early 2025, a dangerous misconception persisted that the U.S. administration was naturally aligned with the anti-Taliban opposition. In reality, powerful lobbying interests within the U.S. began viewing the Taliban through a "Realpolitik" lens, seeing them as a pragmatic, albeit brutal, tool for regional containment. While the U.S. continues its attempts to shape the global order in its favor, other regional powers remain active players, complicating Washington’s goals. Amidst these international maneuvers, the true tragedy remains the ongoing and unceasing suffering of the Afghan people.
The Shadow in Kandahar: A Leader Without a Face
At the heart of Afghanistan's current failure is a man who does not exist in the public eye. Hibatullah Akhundzada, the Supreme Leader, is a ghost. According to a 2026 BBC investigation, there are only two public photographs of him.
(The BBC has
verified a second rare photo of Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada (left),
though other sources confirm only one.)Akhundzada has no digital footprint, gives no televised speeches, and refuses to meet with the people or even his own ministers in person.
The "Invisible" Failure:
Rule by Landline: Akhundzada governs from secretive, fortified compounds in Kandahar via handwritten notes and landline phones, bypassing the Kabul administration.
Incompetence and Exodus: This "Shadow Rule" has led to total administrative paralysis. Millions of Afghans have fled into neighboring countries like Iran and Pakistan, living in squalor as the "invisible" leadership in Kandahar refuses to provide a viable path for the nation.
On Whose Instruction?
The question of "In whose name does he work?" haunts the nation. Analysts believe a shadowy Kandahar Shura (council) of ultra-conservative clerics uses him as a mouthpiece. Others point to foreign intelligence organizations—notably the Pakistani ISI—as the silent hand behind his reclusiveness, ensuring the leadership remains untargetable and opaque.
This leads to a deeper debate over the Taliban's identity: are they a domestic movement or a foreign proxy?
According to analysis by 8am Media, while the Taliban are Afghan by birth, they function as a "foreign" entity in practice.
Their governance model does not stem from Afghan tribal traditions or modern civil aspirations, but from a cross-border extremist ideology that prioritizes the interests of regional sponsors over the Afghan people. This explains the "Shadow in Kandahar": a leader who does not need to face his people because his true mandate comes from an external order rather than an internal social contract.
Massoud’s Prophecy: The Architecture of the "Emirate"
To understand why the Taliban remains a "ghost regime" in 2026, one must look back to the final insights of Ahmad Shah Massoud. In his last interview with Piotr Balcerowicz in August 2001—conducted just weeks before his assassination—the "Lion of Panjshir" deconstructed the very DNA of the Taliban.
Massoud identified that the Taliban’s power was never organic; it was built on a "Veil of Deception" and "Foreign Architecture." * The Pakistani Architect: Massoud explicitly accused Pakistan of being the primary engine of the Taliban, using them to reduce Afghanistan from a state to a tribal vacuum they could control.
The Rejection of the "Emirate": Massoud revealed that the Taliban once offered him the role of Prime Minister if he simply accepted their "Emirate." He rejected it, stating it was "impossible to coexist" with an ideology that refused democratic consensus.
The External Life Support: Massoud’s most haunting warning was that the Taliban were already alienated from the people in 2001. He predicted they would collapse the moment external support—from Pakistan and foreign fighters like bin Laden—was withdrawn.
In 2026, his words ring true: the "Shadow in Kandahar" is the final evolution of a movement that Massoud saw as a foreign-backed shell, incapable of bringing "universal happiness" or ethnic unity to the Afghan people.
A Week of Blood in February 2025 & 2026 Fronts
A Week of Blood: The February 2025 Attacks By mid-February 2025, the Taliban’s narrative of "absolute security" was shattered by a series of targeted strikes:
The Kunduz Bank Massacre (Feb 11, 2025): A suicide bomber targeted a crowd outside a Kabul Bank branch in Kunduz. The victims were predominantly Taliban security personnel who had gathered to collect their salaries. While official reports were characteristically vague, local sources confirmed that several members were killed.
The Kabul Ministry Strike (Feb 13, 2025): Just two days later, an explosion rocked the capital. Interior Ministry Spokesman Abdul Mateen Qani confirmed that a member of the Taliban security forces was killed and three others wounded in a blast at the Ministry of Urban Development and Housing.
As is typical, the Taliban administration consistently underreported these losses. However, the recurring nature of these "payday attacks" suggests a deep-seated vulnerability and a growing local resentment against systemic corruption.
Coinciding with these security failures, the Taliban intensified their crackdown on dissent. On February 13, 2025, the intelligence agency and the Ministry of Information and Culture issued a sudden directive banning all domestic media from broadcasting political programs. This "one-voice policy" was designed to stifle critical debate and force media outlets to relay only official propaganda.
2026 – A
Fractured Emirate and the Rise of Resistance
In 2026, the pressure has evolved from sporadic bombings to a regime cracking from the inside out.
The above-mentioned landmark BBC investigation in January 2026 confirmed that the Taliban leadership is no longer a monolith. Leaked audio captured Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada warning that internal discord could lead to the regime's total collapse.
The rift is now a battle between Kandahar Hardliners (favoring isolation and ideological purity) and Kabul Pragmatists (who favor limited global engagement to save the economy). This reached a breaking point in late 2025 when Kabul ministers openly defied Akhundzada’s order for a nationwide internet shutdown, restoring access within days.
2026: A New Front of Resistance and Censorship:
Checkpoint Warfare: In mid-February 2026, the Afghanistan Freedom Front (AFF) escalated its campaign, claiming responsibility for deadly strikes against checkpoints in Kunduz, mirroring the geography of the 2025 bank blast.
The Media Blackout: On February 13, 2026, the intelligence agency officially banned domestic media from political programming once again—a desperate attempt to hide the internal rifts from the Afghan public.
The instability has now crossed borders: On February 22, 2026, the Pakistani military launched pre-dawn airstrikes in Nangarhar and Paktika provinces.
The Cost of Incompetence: Taliban officials confirmed that at least 17 civilians, including 11 children, were killed in Nangarhar alone when a residential home was struck.
The Reaction: The Taliban's Ministry of Defense has vowed a "calculated response," but the strike reveals a regime that cannot protect its borders or its people.
As the insurgency grows, the Taliban has shifted toward a policy of systematic retaliation against the local population and former officials:
Collective Punishment: In response to NRF and AFF strikes, the Taliban has implemented "tit-for-tat" measures, including arbitrary house searches (hausdurchsuchung) and mass arrests in neighborhoods suspected of harboring resistance.
Targeting the Diaspora: The regime has reportedly extended its reach abroad, threatening or assassinating anti-Taliban figures in neighboring countries. In late 2025, reports emerged of former Afghan military commanders being targeted in Iran.
Legalized Repression: The January 2026 Criminal Procedural Regulations have effectively legalized vigilante violence, allowing "morality police" to punish citizens based on social status, while offering near-impunity to the Taliban elite.
"International Conspiracies" and the Path Forward
While the Taliban functions as a de facto government, their operations continue to be shadowed by foreign intelligence interference aimed at sabotaging the opposition. This complex web of "international conspiracies" was long ago predicted by the late resistance leader Ahmad Shah Massoud, who famously warned:
"The international conspiracies increased and more than the international conspiracies our own desires became dangerous."
(Kabul with
Hindu Kush mountain range in the background stands as a crossroads of history,
having survived the rise and fall of countless regimes over three millennia.)The question is no longer just what the Taliban will do next, but how much longer their fractured leadership can hold against a resistance that is growing more professional while they alienate the very people they claim to govern.
Comments
Post a Comment