Alternative facts about the latest attack by an Afghan man in Munich
On 11 February 2025 Farhad Noori, a 24-year-old Afghan male assailant, carried out a terrorist attack in Munich, Germany, injuring more than 30 people. Update: (15 February 2025): Two of the injured, a 37-year-old Algerian Sunni Muslim woman and her two-year-old daughter, succumbed to their injuries. The incident in Munich has happened about one week prior to the German Bundestag elections, which shall be discussed later. This article shall discuss the inconsistencies in German media about this incident and the influence of the terrorist attack on the Munich Security Conference (MSC) via U.S. vice president Vance's speech.
Some (false) facts spread by German media
The claims by German media, which are questionable, are in bold and highlighted:
German police declared that Farhad N. had shared videos by a Salafist preacher from North Rhine-Westphalia:
Of course, neither the police nor German mainstream media will give any details on the Salafist preacher, of whom the terrorist shared and liked posts. But German media stress that the perpetrator posted on social media in the language of Dari, which is a sub-language of Parsi and close to the Iranian spoken language Farsi/Persian:
Dari is suppressed by Pashto speaking Taliban leaders and German media probably want to prove that the Taliban wasn't behind this attack. This is complete nonsense, as even Taliban media representatives speak Dari to reach the Pashtuns who don't speak Pashto. Jamil Qaderi, a famous pro-Taliban YouTuber, who was located in Belgium and later deported to Afghanistan, spoke both Dari and Pashto on his channel. But his programs were mainly in Dari. The question arises why German media never mentioned the Pashtun origin of the knife attackers but mentioned the Dari/Persian language in this case.
Later Bild, a German tabloid paper, which has close ties to German police and top politicians, claimed that Farhad Noori mostly posted his comments in Arabic. This claims seems ridiculous, as Afghans usueally don't speak Arabic at all. In spite of this widespread fact Bild turned a blind eye on it and publicised it anyway:
On 7 February 2025 Afghan media reported that Jamil Qaderi has been deported from Belgium to Afghanistan and his asylum has been revoked:
"However, the investigators stated that the suspect could not be linked to a terrorist organization such as IS. He had prayed in a mosque, but it could not be characterized as Islamist. (...) He traveled to Switzerland, among other places, and showed up in expensive cars and a suit. There is no evidence to date of possible mental illnesses at the time of the crime, which could have been decisive for his actions. (…) The file situation regarding Farhad's residence has been quite complicated since he came to Germany: in 2016 he entered the country as an unaccompanied minor. (…) Another oddity: Until the day of the attack yesterday, Thursday, neither the residence permit nor the fictitious certificates were filed in the Central Register of Foreigners, the federal government's central foreigners file. (…) According to the verdict, Farhad N. is an Afghan with Tajik ethnicity. In June 2017, he told the BAMF that he was being persecuted in his homeland by "members of a gang". They had previously raided his father's shop and killed him. (…) His presentation contained "inconsistencies" and he also appeared implausible during the oral hearing. (…) According to the verdict, medical certificates submitted which confirmed that the asylum seeker had post-traumatic stress disorder were from 2017. (…) His IQ was "below average," the verdict said. (…) But despite the legal defeat, N. stayed in Germany and seemed to be developing in a good direction - until he got into his white Mini Cooper on Thursday and drove into a demonstration march organized by the Ver.di union."
(German original: "Allerdings, so führten die Ermittler aus, lasse sich der Tatverdächtige keiner Terrororganisation wie dem IS zuordnen. Er habe in einer Moschee gebetet, die sich aber nicht als islamistisch charakterisieren lasse. Er reiste unter anderem in die Schweiz, zeigte sich mit teuren Autos und im Anzug. Hinweise auf mögliche psychische Erkrankungen zum Tatzeitpunkt, die für sein Handeln entscheidend sein könnten, gibt es bislang nicht. (…) Recht kompliziert ist die Aktenlage zum Aufenthalt, seit Farhad nach Deutschland gekommen ist: 2016 war er als unbegleiteter Minderjähriger eingereist. (…) Eine weitere Merkwürdigkeit: Bis zum Tag des Anschlags am gestrigen Donnerstag waren weder der Aufenthaltstitel noch die Fiktionsbescheinigungen im Ausländerzentralregister hinterlegt, der zentralen Ausländerdatei des Bundes. (…) Farhad N. ist laut dem Urteil Afghane mit tadschikischer Volkszugehörigkeit. Gegenüber dem Bamf hatte er im Juni 2017 angegeben, dass er in seiner Heimat von »Mitgliedern einer Bande« verfolgt werde. Diese hätten zuvor schon den Laden seines Vaters überfallen und diesen getötet. (…) Sein Vortrag habe »Unstimmigkeiten« aufgewiesen, auch während der mündlichen Verhandlung habe er unglaubwürdig gewirkt. (…) Laut Urteil stammten vorgelegte ärztliche Atteste, die dem Asylbewerber eine posttraumatische Belastungsstörung bescheinigten, aus dem Jahr 2017. (…) Sein IQ sei »unterdurchschnittlich«, hieß es in dem Urteil. (…) Doch trotz der gerichtlichen Niederlage blieb N. in Deutschland und entwickelte sich scheinbar in eine gute Richtung – bis er am Donnerstag in seinen weißen Mini Cooper stieg und in einen Demonstrationszug der Gewerkschaft Ver.di steuerte.")
Some questions arise after reading the main points of the article:-the accumulation of attacks in Germany within a short period reported by media on Afghan perpetrators seems suspect
-the assailant Farhad Noori wasn't injured in that attack, while usually terrorists usually get injured or killed by bullets fired by policemen
-German media is reluctant about sharing information on the Afghan attackers' motives, while they seemed to have a very active past
-it's the final stage of the election campaigns of German political parties and the closer election day becomes in Germany, the tougher become the election campaigns of the parties struggling for political power and the more interference comes from foreign countries, in particular the USA to empower the far-right AfD
-the Taliban is under enormous pressure from inside and outside.
-there is a lot of international media coverage, as the Munich Security Conference (MSC) is taking place simultaneously
-there's footage of the assailant, while being fixed on the ground and shouting the Islamic Shahada (the Islamic oath) in Arabic, loud and clear enough for the media to capture every word
-Germany media cited German police with conflicting reports: first they claimed that the criminal record of the perpetrator of the Munich attacker contained many crimes, while later they corrected it and told that he had no criminal past and worked as a store detective. He could as well be a police informer (in German: V-Mann of the BND) or an agent of a foreign country, which German media would probably never reveal.
-the terrorist was influenced by a mysterious Salafist preacher, while Germany has a very strong Salafist community. There's still the possibility that the perpetrator of the Munich attack was blackmailed as he might still have close relatives in Afghanistan. This in combination with his below-average IQ, according to Spiegel Online, makes him an easy prey for manipulation by both terrorist organization like ISIS and Taliban (and their backers) and foreign intelligence.
-Germany has also ties with the Taliban and a huge Pashtun community lobbying for the Taliban.
-anti-Taliban opposition will convene in Vienna next week for fifth round of talks
So again it looks like the scheme of a Taliban terrorist attack who supposedly gave the order. The timing is quite precise: just before elections and while the pressure on the Taliban is very high. It seems that someone is interested in influencing the German elections.
Update (20 February 2025): People on social media have expressed their concerns that the attacks might be plotted by states or organizations to influence the German elections. The most prominent person among them is Marietta Slomka, a famous German journalist who has been the anchor of TV news show heute-journal since 2001. She uttered the following words on her private social media account: "Magdeburg. Aschaffenburg. Munich. If someone wanted to try to influence the German election campaign, he/she/it would imagine it exactly like this."
On 18 Ferbuary 2025 the media service Kress quoted German security expert Jörg Trauboth, who spoke on the public broadcaster Phoenix and said that he does not believe that the crime was committed by a lone perpetrator in Munich. "I think there could be something completely different behind it," Trauboth said in the studio interview. Due to the frequency of such crimes, he suspects there is a system behind it. "Something tells me that the election outcome is being influenced," said Trauboth. The perpetrators are always foreigners and "low-level perpetrators who may have been hired from somewhere and who have a mission." This mission is to create unrest and possibly to put migration policy to the test shortly before the election. It could be that the threat comes from within but is controlled from outside.
That the threat is from within is very clear, as there are sleeper cells in Germany. And of course they get their orders from outside.
Speech of the U.S. vice president on the Munich Security Conference (MSC)
On 14 February 2025 JD Vance, vice president of the USA, spoke at the Munich Security Conference (MSC). His speech was mainly atacking Europe and Germany. He showed his support for the AfD, a far-right German party participating in the Bundestag elections on 23 February 2025. Vance tried to lecture Germany on freedom of speech and how migration destroyed Germany. Vance mentioned that mass migration has destroyed Europe and used the terrorist attack in Munich to prove his point. The following is an excerpt from his speech on YouTube (from 14:08 till 15:43), in which he politicized the attack for his purposes:
"I believe there is nothing more urgent than mass migration today. Almost one in five people living in this country moved here from abroad; that is, of course, an all-time high. It's a similar number, by the way, in the United States, also an all-time high. The number of immigrants who entered the EU from non-EU countries doubled between 2021 and 2022 alone, and, of course, it's gotten much higher since. We know the situation didn't materialize in a vacuum; it's the result of a series of conscious decisions made by politicians all over the continent and others across the world over the span of a decade. We saw the horrors wrought by these decisions yesterday in this very city, and, of course, I can't bring it up again without thinking about the terrible victims who had a beautiful winter day in Munich ruined; our thoughts and prayers are with them and will remain with them. But why did this happen in the first place? It's a terrible story, but it's one we've heard way too many times in Europe, and unfortunately, too many times in the United States as well. An asylum seeker, often a young man in his mid-20s, already known to police, rams a car into a crowd and shatters a community. How many times must we suffer these appalling setbacks before we change course and take our shared civilization in a new direction?"
It seems that the speech of JD Vance was well-prepared, probably too well-prepared as he didn't read from any script. Either he waited for that one moment when a man in his mid-20s (the attacker was 24 years old) perpetuates an attack just before he delivers his speech, or ... The USA seems to be already meddling in German elections. This statement of Vance also came after the Taliban mocked the West. There are certain signs that certain elements of the Trump administration, which signed the Doha agreement with the Taliban in 2020 and thus brought the Taliban back to power, wants to plot against the anti-Taliban resistance again. Ahmad Shah Massoud (1953 - 9 September 2001) explained in his historic speech against the Taliban: "The international conspiracies increased and more than the international conspiracies our own desires became dangerous."
Once again it seems that foreign countries are trying to sabotage the successes against the Taliban and Pashtun political elites, while the Taliban is under severe pressure. Afghan athletes have already begun to speak out against what they call "They sold Afghanistan to the Taliban". It was already predicted on this blog that the Taliban and foreign supporters (Arab Gulf states) of the Taliban would react to that pressure in a harmful way.
According to media reports from 14 February 2025 the Taliban continue to provide shelter and protection to al-Qaeda operatives across Afghanistan, with low-profile members living under the watch of Taliban intelligence in Kabul neighborhoods such as Qala-e-Fathullah, Shahr-e-Naw, and Wazir Akbar Khan, according to a new United Nations Security Council report. According to that report senior al-Qaeda leaders have been relocated to rural strongholds in Sar-e-Pul, Kunar, Ghazni, Logar, and Wardak Provinces.
On 13 February 2025 the Taliban yet again visited one of their main owners, namely Qatar:
Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban’s deputy prime minister for economy, met there with Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani. Qatar has close ties with the Taliban and also plays a role as a mediator between the Taliban and Western countries. This travel seems to be in order to seek assistance against the pressure.
Related videos:
Comments
Post a Comment