Taliban's Main Allies
Last Updated: July 02, 2025
Several countries are actively seeking to establish diplomatic relations with the Taliban, each motivated by different factors.
However, a notable group of nations has developed particularly strong ties with the Taliban, viewing them as genuine allies.
Among these countries are:
Both Germany and Pakistan lack significant natural resources, such as oil, gas, and rare earth minerals, which renders them more susceptible to external pressures, compelling them to engage with potentially controversial groups. In contrast, Qatar pursues specific objectives, primarily focusing on expanding its influence among Sunni populations in various regions around the globe. Further details regarding the involvement of these three countries will be discussed below.
Similarities between Taliban in Afghanistan and HTS in SyriaAs these countries seek to strengthen their ties with the Taliban, it is
crucial to grasp the motivations driving their diplomatic efforts.
Whether their actions are fueled by economic incentives, geopolitical
ambitions, or a desire for greater regional influence, the strategies
employed by these nations will significantly shape the future of
Afghanistan and its standing within the international community. The
evolving dynamics of these relationships could also have broader
implications for regional stability and international relations,
necessitating close observation and analysis.
While Pakistan has been the main enemy of Afghanistan for decades and has trained the most extreme groups in Pakistan, the other two have become Taliban's allies later. Qatar was not an influential country before and has risen to power just recently. But together with its ally Turkey, Qatar strove to control the Islamic world. While Turkey and Pakistan coordinate Jihadist Salafist fighters, Qatar, through its gas revenues, sponsors the money needed for the training and establishing of terrorist cells in the world. Through its popular media channel Al Jazeera and other media channels, which are mainly in Arabic and English, Qatar also spreads terrorist propaganda even into Western countries.
Qatar does it mainly because it is interested in sectarian violence to control the Islamic world in coordination with Turkey, which is a NATO member. Qatar is the main backer of many terrorist groups, i.e. Ahmad al-Sharaa's (former al-Jolani's) HTS terrorist group in Syria. HTS is the abbreviation for Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. The terrorist group was formed out of former ISIS and al-Qaeda's al-Zarqawi branch members. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was an extremist terrorist who chopped off the heads of Shiite civilians in Iraq from 2003 till 2006. In September 2005, he declared "all-out war" on Shiites in Iraq, after the Iraqi government offensive on insurgents in the Sunni town of Tal Afar. Al-Zarqawi was killed in a targeted killing on June 7, 2006 by the USA. Only the killing of this Jordanian Salafist beast weakened sectarianism and reduced bloodshed in Iraq. Ahmed al-Sharaa, known by his terrorist name al-Julani, was a main ally of al-Zarqawi and likely chopped off heads of Shiite captives following al-Zarqawi's orders, before he did the same in Syria under the command of Abu Bakr Baghdadi. Al-Julani later founded the HTS, another terrorist Salafist organisation.
In any case those terrorist organizations only emerged after Arab Salafist Jihadist returned from Afghanistan. While Qatar monitored the financing of Jihadist groups, Erdogan turned Turkey into a pivot for Jihadists around the world and coordinated various extremist Sunni groups, like the al-Qaeda offshoot HTS. Turkey played the similar role to neighboring Syria, as Pakistan played to neighboring Afghanistan, namely the destabilizing role.
It was not
surprising when the henchmen of Syria's new terrorist ruler, al-Julani,
committed massacres against the Alawite population in March 2025, resulting in
the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of civilians. Reports from Western
media indicated that entire Alawite families, including many women and
children, were obliterated by al-Julani's terrorist gangs, known as Hay’at
Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
What makes these atrocities particularly noteworthy is that even Western media reported on them. This is significant given that the West—led by then U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and supported by the European Union—emboldened these new rulers by lifting sanctions against the terrorists. These groups were composed of both Syrian and foreign fighters, in stark contrast to the “rebels” or “freedom fighters” label often used in Western narratives.
Again, experts were not astonished at all, when leaders of the Taliban, which is another major global terrorist organisation, were the first rulers of any state to congratulate HTS, their terrorist counterparts in Syria, by name.
There are many similarities between the two groups:
-Both countries have experienced long-standing conflicts that have deeply affected their societies. Syria’s current crisis originates from the 1980s, primarily exacerbated by the 2011 Arab Spring, while Afghanistan has faced continuous turmoil since the Soviet invasion in the 1980s, leading to various conflicts, including the recent Taliban takeover.
-The rise of new governing entities (HTS in Syria and the Taliban in Afghanistan) reflects complex ideological backgrounds and affiliations, although rooted in different Islamic traditions. Both groups have connections to historical factions involved in prior conflicts.
-Both regimes have powerful supporters in Arab Sunni countries and the West.
-Many countries and powers compete in those countries against each other for influence.
-Both regimes face internal challenges in establishing governance systems and international acceptance, with significant issues regarding constitutional frameworks and political inclusivity.
Qatar's influence on the Taliban
Because Qatar keeps a low profile on its support for global extremist Sunni organizations, there's only little information on how it organizes its coordination its financial support for those groups and succeeds in toppling governments in Islamic countries, like Afghanistan and Syria, and control many more governments. Of course, Qatar won't give any insight into its methods of financing global terrorism. It is a wealthy country and can even suppress most articles describing its influence in global issues easily. To describe Qatar's impact on world politics is a very complicated matter indeed and shall not be discussed in this post.
Qatar’s influence on the Taliban, though, can be understood through the lens of its unique diplomatic role and financial engagements highlighted in two articles:
1) Qatar: Afghanistan's gateway to the West (Universidad de Navarra, 06 November 2021)
2) How the Taliban helped build the stadiums for the Qatar World Cup (The Telegraph, 25 November 2022)
According to the first article from November 2021, Qatar has positioned itself as a crucial intermediary between the Taliban and the international community, particularly the West. Since allowing the Taliban to establish a political office in Doha in 2013, Qatar has facilitated dialogue between the group and various state actors, including the United States and, more recently, European powers. This relationship has evolved in the context of a broader geopolitical strategy aimed at enhancing Qatar’s standing in the region, particularly in light of its historical dependence on Saudi Arabia.
The article notes that Qatar's engagement with the Taliban has drawn criticism for potentially legitimizing the group, which was further emphasized by Qatar's willingness to maintain relations even after the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan. The Qatari government has portrayed itself as an impartial mediator, striving to ensure stability in a region marked by turmoil. Western nations, recognizing Qatar's unique position, have begun to rely on it to establish channels of communication with the Taliban, indicating a shift in how international relations with the group are approached.
Financial Engagements
The second
article from November 2022 reveals a financial dimension to Qatar's
relationship with the Taliban, particularly in connection to the construction
activities linked to the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Allegedly, senior Taliban
officials, funded through stipends during peace negotiations, invested in
construction machinery which was then leased for World Cup preparations. This
relationship has reportedly resulted in millions flowing back to the Taliban,
highlighting a complex intertwining of diplomacy and economic interests.
The funding of the Taliban officials’ luxurious lifestyles during their stay in Qatar allowed them to engage in these financial transactions, further solidifying their hold and relevance within the international landscape while enriching the group. The Qatari government has asserted that these financial arrangements were monitored in coordination with the United States, underscoring the international dimensions of their engagement with the Taliban.
Broader Implications
Overall,
Qatar's dual role as a diplomatic mediator and a financial supporter of the
Taliban reflects its strategy of navigating a complex geopolitical landscape.
By fostering ties with the Taliban, Qatar not only seeks to enhance its own
regional influence and mitigate threats from neighboring countries but also
positions itself as a vital player in international efforts to address issues
related to Afghanistan. However, this engagement carries risks, as it may
alienate certain factions within the international community that remain wary
of legitimizing a group like the Taliban.
In summary, Qatar’s influence on the Taliban is multifaceted, encompassing diplomatic efforts to facilitate engagement with the West and economic measures that support the Taliban financially, all while aiming to secure its own geopolitical interests and maintain stability in the region.
Ideological bond between Qatar, the Taliban and other Jihadist groups
Additionally,
both articles overlook an ideological component that is crucial to
understanding Qatar’s actions. Qatar cleverly masks its true intentions, which
involve securing support from extremist Sunni groups through financial aid. It
is essential to recognize that Qatar's hidden agenda is to exert control over
the Sunni community and to promote radicalization as a means to expand its
geopolitical influence both within the Islamic world and beyond, particularly
in the West. This pursuit of power is driven by the pressing need for resources
and space due to the population explosion in many Islamic countries, including Sunni
Arab countries in the Persian Gulf. As Arab Sunnis and other Sunni populations
grow, these wealthy Muslim nations are compelled to seek geographic expansion,
as the increasing number of Arab Sunnis and Sunnis in general will require
additional land and resources to thrive.
Qatar has a structured road map in gaining more power:
-Step 1: Qatar's main goal is to marginalize non-Sunni Muslim minorities, particularly Shiites and Alawites, as a first step. A substantial portion of the Sunni masses has been influenced by Wahhabi/Salafist preaching through television and mosques for decades. The rise of online content and social media has further accelerated Wahhabi propaganda, making these individuals more susceptible to control by Qatar. They often label Shiites with all sorts of false accusations like Kafir (unbelievers), Mushrik (polytheists), Munafiq (hypocrites), Majoos (a derogatory term for Shiites) and accuse them of having a different version of Quran than Sunnis, whom they consider as the true Muslims (following the Sunna/traditions of Prophet Muhammad).
Alawites
face even harsher accusations, including beliefs in immanence (the notion that
the divine encompasses or manifests in the material world), an exaggerated
reverence for the twelve Shia Imams, beliefs in reincarnation, the
prophethood of Muhammad b. Nusayr, as well as the shared prophethood of Imam
Ali and the Prophet Muhammad, and the disregard for the Quran among other claims. Many of these allegations are
baseless and lack reliable sources and evidence.
This rhetoric aims to label Shiites and Alawites as heretics—or ex-Muslims who have left Islam—and to legitimize the shedding of their blood as Halal (lawful) and even obligatory. The average Sunni masses are often misinformed and gullible, readily believing the narratives promoted by preachers funded by Qatar and other countries. They offer them a convenient alternative to engaging directly with the Quran, where they would discover that such assertions are unfounded and that the Quranic verses do not exclude Shiites, Alawites or other minorities from Islam, nor do they categorize them as heretics.
These slurs
against Shiites and Alawites can effectively serve as death sentences when
those who use them attain political power and operate without restraint. This
has been evidenced in the past by attacks on Shiite communities by suicide
bombers in countries like Iraq and Afghanistan. The most recent cases are the
massacres of Alawites in Syria in March 2025.
Shiites and
Alawites have historically coped with oppression in ways similar to those of
other oppressed communities, adapting to their circumstances as necessary. In
many countries with Sunni majorities, Shiite Muslims often resort to Taqiya,
which, in the context of Shia Islam, refers to the practice of concealing one's
beliefs or intentions to evade persecution. This concept can be critical for
individuals living in environments where expressing their religious identity
may lead to harm or discrimination.
Throughout history, various groups facing oppression—whether based on religion, ethnicity, or political beliefs—have employed similar strategies to protect themselves. This can include adopting the outward appearances or behaviors of the dominant group to mitigate risks. Such practices often reflect a deep survival instinct and the complexities of identity in situations of social or political strife. This phenomenon isn't limited to any single group; it's a broader reflection of human resilience and the lengths to which people will go to preserve their lives and communities in the face of adversity. However, it can also lead to challenging dynamics within these communities, as individuals navigate the fine line between preservation and authenticity. This practice is a form of intimidation and often force Shiites to hide their religion in dangerous areas. In areas where sectarian conflict is prevalent, Shiites may experience social ostracism, violence, or pressure to conceal their beliefs for safety. This kind of intimidation can lead to significant psychological and social stress for individuals and communities, forcing them to navigate their religious identities in secret or under duress.
-Step 2: Qatar pursues to control Muslim governments, as land means wealth and power (cp. Taliban, which sell Afghanistan's natural resources and thus get wealthier, while their Afghan opponents struggle).
-Step 3: Qatar extends its influence on Sunni populations in non-Muslim countries, i.e. Europe, USA etc. Once more, a large portion of Sunni masses have been brainwashed for decades; now they are ready to be controlled by Qatar. It does so by extortion and financing mosques, through third countries.
Regardless
of their ideological affiliations—be it the Deobandi/Hanafi sect, as seen with
the Afghan Taliban, or the the more ideological Salafism, to which the Syrian HTS belong—Qatar was able to
unite them and successfully overthrow governments.
Qatar has
indeed played a significant role in various regional conflicts by
providing support to different Sunni factions, often depending on strategic
interests and political objectives. The following three points are
important themes regarding the interplay of ideology, external influence, and
the complexities of intra-Sunni relations in contemporary geopolitics:
-Sunni Unity
and Diversity: While Sunni groups may share a common religious affiliation,
they often have differing ideologies and priorities. For example, Deobandi and
Salafist interpretations of Islam can lead to very different approaches to
governance, society, and violence. The Afghan Taliban, rooted in Deobandi
thought, generally emphasizes a more traditional and localized interpretation
of Islam, while Salafist groups like HTS in Syria may focus on a more global
jihadist agenda.
-External
Influence: Qatar's involvement in various conflicts has included funding,
political support, and media outreach. By backing these groups, Qatar has
sometimes facilitated coalitions among Sunni factions, despite their
ideological differences. This has enabled certain factions to gain power or
influence in specific contexts, such as in Syria and Libya.
-Impact on Governance: The support given to these groups by external players can lead to significant shifts in governance and territorial control. This often results in the overthrow of existing regimes, which can create power vacuums and further conflict.
Qatar appears to exploit Sunni individuals as tools to enhance its own power and influence, rather than genuinely caring for their well-being. Terrorism experts suggest that Qatar may even fund the training of some of these individuals as suicide bombers, which raises serious questions about its intentions. Moreover, the country does not shoulder the financial responsibility of supporting these individuals; instead, European social systems cover their essential needs, such as food, health-care, clothing, and housing. In fact, the benefits that Sunni migrants receive in European nations significantly exceed what they could expect in Arab Gulf countries, Turkey (which itself has one of the highest numbers of asylum seekers in Germany), or other Islamist nations. Consequently, many Sunni migrants are able to save money and send remittances back to their families in non-European countries. This situation raises concerns about the use of taxpayer funds, which are allocated without the consent of a majority of the native population.
Qatar,
along with other Arab Gulf states and Turkey, has been employing Turkey as a crucial transit hub for the movement of predominantly Arab Sunni refugees seeking to reach Europe.
Additionally, it is speculated that Qatar may be financing certain (Western) politicians
to further its discreet expansionist agenda. This strategy highlights the geopolitical
maneuvering in the region and its implications for refugee movements.
Taliban and the International Community
In any case the Taliban are extorting a lot of countries to be recognized, the longer their rule endures in which not even their closest allies have yet recognized that terrorist regime. It is not fear that many shy at recognizing the Taliban regime. Many countries would love to recognize them but it's probably their reputation, which is at stake, by being the first country to recognize the Taliban regime as Afghanistan's government.
Taliban, with their foreign backers and lobbyists, have found their favorite country to pressure towards their recognition.
There are many reasons why Germany is pushed to recognize the Taliban:
-Germany's government does not care about their reputation but more about money
-German politicians destroyed the German economy and does need money (donated by Taliban's Arab allies)
-Taliban can activate their terrorist cells in Germany any time they want
But of all of these reasons the first one is the most important one; its the carelessness of politicians that make terrorist organizations get bold and demand more power and influence. Those politicians are either naive or corrupt and in both cases inept to fulfill their duties towards the citizens of their countries, whom they should represent. They have the task to spend tax money in a wise manner and to be careful in their next political steps. Furthermore, they must bolster the security and freedom in their respective countries.
It is completely the opposite from of what German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock (the Greens) did:
-donating tax payers' money to groups affiliated with Taliban (2021 till 2025)
-deliberately relocating thousands of (mostly Sunni) Afghans from Pakistan to Germany, allegedly without even checking their true identities and nationalities (2021 till 2025)
-donating millions of Euros to terrorists under the leader Ahmed al-Sharaa (al-Julani) in Syria, whom Baerbock elevated by her official visit (as a representative of the German government) on 3 January 2025, without consulting the German public (her visit came suddenly and was a surprise to Germans who were informed about that visit on that day of her visit).
German foreign minister promised the terrorist government another 300 million Euros (probably as a reward) according to German media reports (this comes after their massacres against Alawites!) from March 17, 2025:
Of course, Baerbock cannot be the mastermind behind funding the terrorists in Syria and she seems to be a tool in the hands of secret organizations who promise her safety, if she follows their orders. Baerbock is hardly able to speak two sentences without reading from a script or without making simple mistakes. How can she be the mastermind behind plots?
Germany is utilizing taxpayer funds to support terrorist groups, as previously outlined. The country also faces the highest non-wage labor costs worldwide, encompassing income taxes and social security contributions. Furthermore, the burden of these exorbitant taxes, coupled with rising energy costs, has negatively impacted the German economy, leading it into recession, which happens to be the longest economic crisis in its modern history:
This policy carries
serious financial and security implications for the native population,
exacerbating existing security concerns. Alarmingly, this expenditure of
taxpayers' money occurs without the consent of the majority of the native
populace.
Of course, Taliban leaders are dreaming of recognition when they see pictures of Baerbock sitting and talking with terrorists in black suits. They have seen how Germany publicly financed terrorists in Syria and believe that they can convince Germany's next government (to which Baerbock won't belong) to recognize them, too. Whenever Taliban is under pressure they ask their allies for help. It's probably their allies who have advised the Taliban to try to gradually build up pressure on the next German government likely led by chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) to recognize them. And once you lose your reputation then nothing remains sacred and there's nothing else to lose. At least this is what global terrorists and their backers begin to think of Germany now.
Another issue is the role of the media that plays in Germany - which often is to put governments under pressure. German media have begun to describe the Taliban as a group, with which it is possible to have diplomatic ties, despite its alliance with terrorist groups like al-Qaeda. Often it is even very unclear what motives those media or persons have who propagate for relations with a certain group, as the main motives are decided behind closed doors. But the readers, or consumers, should understand that no paper is save from corruption and that everyone can be bought. Money is a biggest incentive in writing and publicizing propaganda. Sometimes it is also ideological proximity which motivates people (journalists are humans) or papers (decision makers/chiefs of papers) to post or publish something. There might be other reasons as well, but these are basically the two main points.
In this
way, the Great Game between global and regional players will continue in both
Afghanistan and Syria. While meddling into the political affairs of those
countries can be effective in achieving immediate objectives for external
powers, they may also lead to fragmentation and infighting among various Sunni
factions in the long run. The lack of a cohesive ideology or overarching
leadership can result in challenges for governance and stability in the regions
affected. Understanding the dynamics in these conflicts is crucial for
analyzing ongoing conflicts and the potential for future cooperation or
conflict among various groups.
Germany under Chancellor Merz
Following
the German elections, there was a period of relative calm in Germany, during which the
German media suddenly almost completely ceased reporting on Afghan issues. This shift reflected a
diminished interest, as Afghans no longer seemed relevant to German policy
priorities at that time. However, after several months, Afghan matters once
again regained the attention of German politicians.
Germany,
under Chancellor Merz, appears to be continuing the appeasement policies
previously pursued by Merkel and Scholz toward the Taliban. The German
government is actively working to facilitate the transfer of more so-called
"Afghans"—many of whom have not undergone thorough verification of
their identities—from Pakistan to Afghanistan, and is also engaging in deals
with the Taliban to deport criminals back to Afghanistan. According to a report
on Zeit Online dated June 4, 2025, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadepuhl,
representing the ruling CDU, plans to bring approximately 2,500 at-risk Afghans
to Germany:
"It’s about 2,500 vulnerable Afghans – Foreign
Minister Wadepuhl wants to bring these people to Germany." (German original: "
To prevent public criticism of this policy, officials frame
these transfers as efforts to rescue Afghans in danger. However, it is widely
recognized that most Afghans in Pakistan seeking asylum in Germany are
Pashtuns, the same ethnic group as the Taliban leadership, while non-Pashtun
Afghans who have fled to Iran face significant obstacles in obtaining visas.
Additionally, German media outlets have reported that the previous government, under Chancellor Scholz, almost facilitated the entry of Taliban-affiliated individuals into Germany. On May 27, 2025, Welt, citing a report on Spiegel Online, revealed that NGOs have provided refugees with falsified or tailored documents and even encouraged false statements during visa applications. Reports indicate that the German Federal Police have been able to intercept men with ties to the Taliban attempting to fly to Germany, as some applicants submitted suspicious or dubious documentation, which was detected by officials. (However, it appears highly unlikely that the Federal Police have been able to prevent all such individuals from attempting to travel to Germany. Time will tell.)
Furthermore,
Schahina Gambir, a Green Party politician, has been actively advocating for
increased efforts to bring more Afghans from Pakistan into Germany. She has
exerted political pressure on the government to expand these initiatives.
Gambir, who identifies herself as Afghan, is likely of Pashtun
ethnicity—judging by her name and appearance—though she does not explicitly
specify her ethnicity. As a Pashtun woman, she probably
sees an opportunity to facilitate the migration of as many Pashtuns as possible
to Germany.
According to her profile on the Green Party’s official website, she was born in Kabul in 1991:
She completed her bachelor’s degree in political science and economics, followed by a master’s degree in gender studies. Although her academic background centers around politics and women’s rights, she has not publicly criticized or addressed the Taliban’s oppression of Afghan women in speeches or official statements, aside from a few notes on social media platforms such as Instagram and X. No such videos addressing the Taliban oppression can be found online.
But Germany's policy of appeasement extends beyond migration. Recent reports indicate that the German government is engaging in direct negotiations with Taliban leaders. According to a post of the so-called Afghan embassy in Qatar on X, Taliban ambassador Mohammad Suhail Shaheen met with Rolf Dieter Reinhard, the Chargé d’Affaires of the German Embassy in Afghanistan:
په دوحه کې د ا.ا.ا. سفير محمد سهیل شاهین د افغانستان لپاره د جرمني د سفارت له چارسمبالي، ښاغلي رولف دیټر راینهارډ سره وکتل. په دې کتنه کې دواړو لوریو د افغانستان او جرمني ترمنځ په دوهاړخیزو اړیکو، یوشمېر سیاسي مسایلو 1/2
Translation of the post: "In Doha, Ambassador Mohammad Suhail Shaheen met with the Chargé d’Affaires of the German Embassy in Afghanistan, Mr. Rolf Dieter Reinhard. During the meeting, the two sides discussed bilateral relations between Afghanistan and Germany, a number of political issues, and the prospects for cooperation between the two countries. 1/2"
This
indicates a de facto diplomatic engagement with the terrorist group, likely
motivated by financial incentives and third-party influence, especially from
Qatar, which maintains close ties with the Taliban.
This ongoing engagement suggests that the Taliban is being
encouraged—possibly through third-party channels—to deepen its interactions
with Germany, with financial motives potentially serving as the primary
incentive behind these diplomatic overtures.
Moreover, there are signs that these negotiations are making progress. For example, on June 11, 2025, Daniela Behrens, the Interior Minister of Niedersachsen (Lower Saxony) from the SPD Party, announced her intention to increase deportation flights to Afghanistan:
This suggests a political willingness within Germany to facilitate the return of Afghan nationals, possibly through diplomatic channels that elevate the Taliban's status. However, these deportations could also serve as a strategic move—an initial step or pretext—to gradually elevate the Taliban to a more significant role as a strategic partner in German foreign policy.
A side note on France's role
France’s role in recent developments marks a significant departure from its former stance. Unlike the late 1990s and early 2000s, when France actively supported the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance led by Ahmad Shah Massoud, it now appears to be leaning toward engagement with the Taliban. Despite multiple meetings between French President Emmanuel Macron and resistance leader Ahmad Massoud, there are indications that France may have been influenced—likely through incentives from Qatar—to establish diplomatic ties with the Taliban. This suggests that France has effectively relinquished its previous position of opposition. Supporting this, a post on X from the Afghan embassy in Doha reported that Ambassador Mohammad Sohail Shaheen met with Jean-Marin Schuh, the French chargé d’affaires for Afghanistan, indicating a possible diplomatic engagement with the Taliban’s representatives:
Moreover, the Taliban are not the only terrorist group to have received recognition from the European Union. For instance, Ahmad al-Sharaa, a known ISIS terrorist, was officially recognized by the EU and even visited France on May 7, 2025. Remarkably, this visit was no longer met with media criticism or controversy, reflecting a normalization of relations with designated terrorist figures.
The economic realities in Europe also influence these developments. Many EU member states lack substantial natural resources, and their industries and economies are gradually shrinking. Consequently, European countries may be more receptive to support or incentives from wealthy Sunni Arab states. For example, Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) football team is sponsored by Qatar Airways, which has reportedly invested over 2 billion euros into the club. This raises questions about how much Qatar visitors spend and the extent of political influence or “bribery” involved—since such financial support likely comes with expectations or repayment. In this context, external actors continue to exert pressure to promote recognition of the Taliban, often using financial incentives as leverage.
Finally, it is important to recognize that being labeled a terrorist no longer solely signifies ideological differences; it increasingly relates to financial backing and external assistance.
Europe, while attempting to influence U.S. policy through lobbying, recognizes that the United States holds the final authority. Due to their limited economic and military strength, European nations are often unable to pursue independent policies and instead seek to sway U.S. decisions in their favor. In this strategic environment, Qatar aims to achieve what Pakistan and the UAE couldn't accomplish, although they even recognized the previous Taliban regime between 1995 and 2021. Qatar seeks to buy international legitimacy through strategic financial and diplomatic means.
The
Campaign of the Israeli Mossad and Germany Against Afghan People
As mentioned earlier, Germany under Chancellor Merz continues the policies of
previous administrations. It appears that they have initiated another operation
targeting individuals with Afghan backgrounds. Recently, the German government
ordered the arrest of a 53-year-old Danish man of Afghan descent by Danish
police, allegedly for spying for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Germany.
You might also be wondering why many terrorist attacks in the West committed by Afghans seem to occur specifically in Germany, while not a single terrorist crime of Syrian Sunnis is published by the media.
It is
noteworthy that this development coincided shortly after German Interior
Minister Alexander Dobrindt’s visit to Israel on June 29, 2025, where he met
with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
During his visit, Dobrindt discussed security issues with Netanyahu and emphasized the importance of digital defense against sabotage and espionage.Israel is ahead of Germany in cyber defense, claimed Alexander Dobrindt. It was also Dobrindt himself who announced the arrest of the Afghan-Danish man.
The Israeli intelligence agency Mossad is known for its active role in global conflicts, often beyond the direct interests of Israel. According to Victor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad officer, Israel has been involved in many international conflicts, even those not directly related to Israeli interests. Ostrovsky, who authored books such as By Way of Deception (1990) and The Other Side of Deception (1995), detailed Mossad’s methods and operations during his time serving the organization.
Ostrovsky describes one occasion in his book as follows: "They did in Sri Lanka, however. Amy Yaar made the connection, then tied the country in militarily by supplying it with substantial equipment, including PT boats for coastal patrol. At the same time, Yaar and company were supplying the warring Tamils with anti-PT boat equipment to use in fighting the government forces.
The
Israelis also trained elite forces for both sides, without either side knowing
about the other, and helped Sri Lanka cheat the World Bank and other investors out
of millions of dollars to pay for all the arms they were buying from them."
[Victor Ostrovsky, By Way of Deception, p.67 f., Ch. Freshmen]
It is likely that Mossad is currently operating in
Afghanistan, possibly having infiltrated the Taliban leadership, which suggests
that some members of the Taliban may be on Mossad’s payroll. Those familiar
with Mossad’s methods are well aware of the organization’s typical practices.
Most, if not all, of the Taliban leadership are believed to be influenced or controlled by foreign intelligence agencies, such as Pakistan’s ISI. In his 2023 book The Return of the Taliban, historian and scholar Hassan Abbas states that the Taliban leadership is clearly under the influence of foreign intelligence, especially the Pakistani ISI. Many other experts and historians concur with his assessment. Abbas also notes that Taliban family members are based in Pakistan, which allows the ISI to exert influence over them through blackmail.
Meanwhile, Iranian security forces have released numerous videos of interrogations where Afghan men claim to be Mossad agents, some asserting their contacts are based in Germany. Iran has used these claims as a pretext to carry out mass deportations of Afghan migrants. In reality, Iran’s military and other security agencies have also been infiltrated—not mainly by Afghans, but by Iranian spies working for Israel and Mossad.
Afghan reactions, such as that of former Afghan Foreign Minister Rangin Dadfar Spanta, have expressed concern. On June 29, 2025, he posted on X, criticizing Iran’s increased deportations since Israel’s attack on Iran: “Iran is facing numerous problems, and it is difficult for refugees to integrate into the labor market and social structure of this country. However, that is no justification for making accusations and creating enemies of them.”
ایران با مشکلات عدیدهای مواجه است و ادغام مهاجران در بازار کار
و ساختار اجتماعی این کشور دشوار است، اما این موضوع توجیهی برای اتهامزنی و دشمنتراشی
علیه آنها نیست
While Israel and Iran continue their fierce rivalry, it appears that once again, Afghan people are caught in the crossfire, exploited as tools in these conflicts. Many Afghans, impoverished and psychologically vulnerable due to decades of war and unrest, are easy targets. Additionally, it appears that Germany has imported hundreds of thousands of Afghans, possibly to recruit agents or for other strategic purposes. The reasons for allowing in many more Syrian Sunnis remain unclear.
Related
Articles:
Chronology of the beginning of
Taliban's decline in 2025 - Pt. 1
Chronology of the beginning of
Taliban's decline in 2025 - Pt. 2
Ahmad Shah Massoud: the
international conspiracies increased
Mirwais Azizi - a Pashtun
pro-Taliban lobbyist in Dubai
How Pakistani Leaders Support The
Terrorist Taliban
Pakistani politician interfering in Afghanistan’s affairs
Anti-Taliban Opposition in Vienna
Ahmad Massoud chides European states
for potential deal with Taliban
Ahmad Massoud's Views - Part 2 - his
Interview with Afghanistan International
Alternative facts about the latest
attack by an Afghan man in Munich
Germany becomes new ally of the
Taliban
Anti-Taliban Opposition in Vienna
Ahmad Shah Massoud: The
international conspiracies increased
Pakistan tries to fool US president Trump about the 2021 Kabul airport bombing
Related
Videos:
Pashtun Taliban Commander:
"Shoot NRF prisoners." (Sept. 2022)
Taliban cut fruit trees of their
rivals
Taliban And Terrorist Groups -
Afghan Cmdr. (Ret.) Of Tora Bora
Taliban Terrorist Boss In Germany
Ahmad Massoud: "Taliban have no
legitimacy in Afghanistan"
Pashtun Taliban Commander:
"Shoot NRF prisoners." (Sept. 2022)
Taliban massacre Tajik Afghans
Taliban Killed Hundreds Of Afghan
Former Soldiers Since August 31, 2021
Taliban And Terrorist Groups -
Afghan Cmdr. (Ret.) Of Tora Bora
They sold Afghanistan to Taliban
Pakistan Supports Taliban In Afghanistan - History Of Supporting Terrorism (English)
In Germany: Taliban And ISIS Marching Together - Essen, Germany - Nov. 3, 2023
Comments
Post a Comment